IQ

My IQ is so high that it is immeasurable.

Piracy

Nothing is free in this world. Therefore, never expect things to be free. For whatever things you get, you really should pay for them. Any kind of payment will do, as long as as it is agreed by both willing payer and willing payee. However, just because you have paid, it does not mean it is over. You are responsible to ensure that the payee is the right or legal party to receive the payment. Else, if the payment is received by the wrong or illegal party and you are fine with it, then you are like you are stealing things. Read: piracy.

The Will To Perfection 9

Communism is the opposite of individualism.

The Will To Perfection 8

Neutralists, who claim themselves as always being considerate, are indeed, biased people. They avoid to value the right or wrong of any or certain matters, as if they are so pure that they don't want to be stained by unnecessary arguments. In fact, by avoiding such arguments, it is proved that they are biased, when they judged it as 'unnecessary', regardless it is necessary or unnecessary to judge it like that. It is like, they reserved the 'right' to themselves while saved from labeling others as 'wrong'.

The Will To Perfection 7

The will to truth, the will to power, the will to right, the will to existence, the will to perfection; those are just a few basic wills of a positivist.

The Will To Perfection 6

Philology (philosophy) is about carefully using words (language) to explain things and giving definitions.

The Will To Right, Perfection & Opportunity ( The Will To Perfection 5)

The valuation and estimation of morality. The morality of valuation and estimation. Those are not two but one, unsolved matter that 'haunts' many philosophers, because what are the values, and what are the benchmarks, or at least, if possible or available, the relative measurements?

Assuming morality is something valuable, albeit not mathematically or empirically, there should be a way to compare between two moral values. However, on what ground we are making such assumption? Do such assumption stands solid, strong enough to be considered as valid? Of course in any kind of valuation, there is supposed to be the initial value, or at least the starting point, where possible, if represented in numbers, would be zero.

Since the beginning of the so-called morality, which, in many known civilizations and cultures, well or not well defined in 'Moral Codes', human has always rely on the cause-consequence pairing mechanism to perform moral valuation. However, this method always involving observation of hunter-prey relationship, where always, if not every time, the victimized are innocent. in other words, it requires sacrifice. This may also apply on single individual, where in this case, he might have sacrificed himself deliberately or accidentally, which the later is the most common. If he survived the former and learn something, he will regret or else, with enough will, try a different, more effective method, while if he survive the later, he will, also learn something, and willing to use a safer alternative method, of course to prevent accident, though accident is not all about bad things since it is all about getting the unexpected or undesired results. Lets call the 'something learned' in this context as experience.

Experience does not teach us exactly the right thing, but rather teaching us to dodge all wrong things, in hope for the right and desired result. Therefore, it is safe to say that experience is all about accident and despair, directly or indirectly. Now, consider that sacrifice and accident, in both individual or collective community, are unnecessary of avoidable in order to give any value to morality, how are we going to value it, when sacrifice and accident has been our morality benchmarking mechanism all this time?

One way any philosopher may venture is, to create the value itself, from scratch. This may sound extremely easy, even without initial value, since any value to be created itself is to be considered initial, if the valuation is to be conducted randomly, without considering any other factors that may give visible or insignificant effect to the resulting value, if those factor were considered. However, as the valuation process expands, even at the slowest possible rate, things will surely become extremely complicated. At this stage, philosophers who try to do the valuation might ct like law-giver, law-creator. nothing wrong for acting like that, but that is the risky part of moral valuation, even at the very basic stage of moral valuation.

The Will To Perfection 4

Flawless is a flaw.

The Will To Perfection 3

Philology (philosophy) is about carefully using words (language) to explain things and giving definitions.

The Will To Perfection 2

Human should not enslave other human, for human itself is already a slave.

Will to Perfection 1

Justice is not about treating people equally, but treating people accordingly.

Yaoi vs Hentai vs Yuri (Part 3)

Yaoi is more less the fangirls expectation, and not just a mere manipulation. Manipulating things into something that you want to see is expecting. You can't make it happen in real life so you expect it to be in fictions.

Direct or indirect, revenge is still a revenge. Liking both yaoi and hentai is a different case, as if you're comparing it with guys who love both hentai and yuri.

Talk about non-sexual yaoi? Then why should we compare it with hentai? We should have compared it with something like romance or harem. So comparing hentai with yaoi/yuri is already wrong here. Oh, I see! If we compare yaoi/yuri with normal romance, we will absolutely know yaoi/yuri is already wrong, even without the presence of sexual intercourse. Add sex to those genres, romance will become hentai, and yaoi/yuri will become something worse than hentai.

Talking about opinion, even though opinion is not fact, they must have supporting fact or else your opinion will left standing on weak basis and should not be called opinion at all. As for me, I'll will stand still to my opinion to prove that they are strong and more considerable than other's.
Back to the topic, like I said earlier, we should have compared non-sex yaoi with romance/harem. Opps! Even in that kind of comparison, yaoi already looks wrong.

Biased happen if you see both parties (you and the opposing) are either right or wrong. For me, I rather stand true to myself because if I excessively try to understand everything, it only shows that I am lack of confidence and support in my statements, or should I say, my opinions are weak with no strong basis. Yes, I do agree that guys don't need hentai to enjoy themselves, but if they do need it, isn't that mean girls should enjoy hentai as well without have to resorting to yaoi?

Last but not least, "Boy love boy is already bad, boy f*ck boy is worse".

OK, I'm sorry if I'm too hard on you all yaoi-fangirls but I have to stand still with my opinion "hentai and yaoi/yuri is not equally wrong". Anyway, debating in internet allows me to go all out without hesitation.

Yaoi vs Hentai vs Yuri (Part 2)

Expecting the guys to treat each other nicely is just too much, as if the guys wanted to see girls treat each other the 'manly' way (ie. slight punches, etc). No, guys doesn't have the interest to see girls act like that so girls should really put a stop on the other way round.

Now, into the hentai itself. Like I said earlier, the guys enjoy hentai for the sole purpose of 'stimulation' and 'excitement'. So, if girls want only the so-called 'fascination', why must it has to be yaoi/gay relationship? I mean, why must it is about sex if not for the stimulation? Doesn't it render the initial purpose pointless? And for yaoi-fangirls info, hentai is not all about taking advantage on girls only. Just because there are a few hentai titles about girls being raped, it doesn't mean all hentai is taking advantage on girls. Take note, hentai is about sexual enjoyment between both genders, so claiming it as taking advantage on girls is so uncalled for.

Revenge doesn't mean you are 'forced' to do the opposite thing. Having the 'sudden' interest in the opposite thing is also a revenge because deep in your heart, you are starting to find yourself a weapon. Then you become curious, and gradually overwhelmed by your curiosity. Over time, you eventually developed your deep interest on the 'weapon' and if you are happy with your 'weapon' then it is the proof that you are really seeking revenge.

About the relationship between hentai and real life is, well, there is a relationship, and the straight relationship is legal even if it is without marriage. Anyway, what I'm pointing here is, the straight relationship is what human supposed to have, not the gay relationship. And girls who enjoy yaoi is not about they want to see guys treat each other nicely, but they just want to see guys f*ck each other. This is gross, and worse than hentai. Why? We may not say yaoi = real life gay, but yaoi is indeed gay no matter how you see it.

Revenge is still a revenge no matter how much you feel of it, or whether it is intended on not. And it is really a revenge if you are talking about being fair & square. And why must we care about unrealistic things? Because the 'unrealistic' measure taken by yaoi fangirls is just too much, like an insult to the guys. Girls may think hentai is also an insult to them, but excuse me? Doesn't this pointing back to the 'revenge' part, where the girls feel insulted and started to look for something to counter this? And why must we care about what yaoi-fangirs feel when we say 'yaoi is worse than hentai' when what they do is indeed the 'worse'? Having the feeling 'hate' towards hentai already shows that you are taking revenge on hentai-fanboys. And if you really want a 'mere entertainment' it doesn't have to be yaoi. Or maybe you actually want a 'stimulation', like what the guys do with hentai? Don't say about 'everybody's got their own opinion' as if there is nothing right or wrong. That only shows that you are biased.

J-Rox

People may wonder why I listen to mostly Japanese songs most of the time? To be honest, it's not that I am a J-Rock fan. It's just that most Japanese songs sounds like a music to my ears because for me, music must be something entertaining, not just for happy-fun purpose like what imposed by 99.99% of englisch and malay songs. Besides, most englisch and malay song are only love-themed which makes me sick all the time. No, it's not that I hate love, but listening to the repeated word 'love' over and over again is too annoying. Love is not the only most beautiful thing in the world y'know? There are many other things can be considered and turned into a them for a song.

Now, how do I manage my playlist? I am extremely strict when it comes to selecting songs. It's not that I listen to any/all available Japanese songs out there. First, I only listen to anime and games OST because for me, being and OST, those songs are like, the best or 'the chosen one'. Then, I from those songs, I choose those that sounds 'rocks' over pop. Normally, pop songs are discarded at this stage.

Next, I search for the englisch translation for the lyrics to give me the rough idea about those songs. Mostly, love-themed songs will be discarded at this level. Only after those strict filtration, the remaining song will successfully enter my playlist. Strict ain't it?

Yaoi vs Hentai vs Yuri

Girls who like yaoi/shonen-ai really did it as a revenge on purpose no matter how they deny it. We may consider the situation where no male enjoys hentai/pr0n, chances are no female will enjoy gross stuff like yaoi/shonen-ai either.

Girls should stop expecting the guys to treat each other very nicely as compared to girls. It is because guys are intended to be a different 'animal' from the beginning. So you can't hope to see guys openly hug each other like the girls do. The guys have the 'manly' way to treat each other so let it be just like that.

What makes me wonder is, what's so fascinating about a guy f*ucking another guy? I found nothing as fascinating as compared to straight intercourse. At least in hentai, the guy and the girls are only doing the natural thing, not the abnormal one. Besides, you can't say the guys are taking advantage on the girls since both gender are enjoying what they are experiencing. So, it isn't simply as hentai is more less as yaoi/shonen-ai.

Girls who want to take 'revenge' towards hentai-watching guys should go for hentai as well instead of yaoi/shonen-ai. No, it's not that I am supporting hentai but as long as you insist on watching them as a mean of revenge, even an unintended one, things won't stop as you hoped for. Hentai may be as gross as yaoi/shonen-ai but at least they have real-life counterpart, which is still a straight one but yaoi/shonen-ai? Will you watch the real-life gay video? I don't think so.

Seeing some guys like yaoi/shonen-ai doesn't mean all guys have the tendency to become gay themselves, although I dare to say those guys who like them are indeed gay.

Restarting... I call it revenge because what yaoi-fangirls di is simply bashing hentai fanboys by saying "You guys say enjoying yaoi is wrong but you enjoy hentai is also wrong. So you have no rights to say anything bad about us since we're even". Doesn't this sounds really like a revenge? Again, that's what I call revenge. If it's not about revenge, then why bother to raise the 'rights' issue here in the first place? Isn't it funny to deny and not admitting that what they do is actually worse than hentai?

Hentai is indeed wrong, of course but to say hentai and yaoi are equually wrong is wrong as well. I dare to say yaoi is worse than hentai because what depicted in yaoi is abnormality while in hentai is natural desire, which is how it is supposed to be. So yaoi-fangirls should stop saying yaoi is as wrong as hentai when it is clear that yaoi is worse than hentai.

What happened in hentai may happen legally in real life in terms of moral, law and religion (read: via legal marriage) but can yaoi? If any yaoi-fangirl say that what they enjoys is the 'unrealistic-ness' (fiction-fantasy) then isn't it mean that yaoi is indeed worse than hentai because it involves abnormality? And even if it is only a fantasy, why must it be a yaoi? Can't the girls enjoy hentai like the guys do instead of going too far by doing something opposite to the nature of human?

This kind of action only proves that those fangirls are only taking revenge on the guys. Nothing else, not even 'seems to' or 'unintentionally'. Girls don't have to go that far by enjoying yaoi just to prove that they're straight. Even guys don't have to be yuri-fanboys just to prove that they're straight either. Just enjoy hentai or nothing at all is adequately enough to prove that you're straight since hentai involves both gender of which, both gender are enjoying each other. So it can be said that there's no such thing as "guys taking advantage on girls" in hentai when both gender are enjoying each other.

For guys, hentai is about stimulation, so hentai is not as sick as yaoi, which is sicker. At least the guys have the valid reason to enjoy hentai, compared to the weak purpose of 'fantasizing the unrealistic' or 'fascination' in yaoi as claimed by most yaoi-fangirls.

Philosophy of Ancient Christianity

During Jesus' life, there were 2 types of 'followers'; those who believe him as a mere prophet, and those who believe him as the son of God. While the later are considered as Christians, what do this Christians describe the former? Heretics? How do they call them? Are those type of followers still exist today?